Why controller-led?Talk to an expert
Free Tool · No signup required

Should You Hire W-2 or 1099?

Compare the true cost of hiring an employee versus a contractor. See the employer cost burden, worker take-home difference, and tax implications for your decision.

Employer Cost Analysis

Cost & Tax Details

W-2 Employee Cost
True annual burden to employer
1099 Contractor Cost
Base compensation only
Potential Savings
Going with contractor

Save Your Comparison Report

A controller-signed payroll audit ensures your employment classifications are defensible. That documentation is worth more than the difference between W-2 and 1099 costs when an audit happens.

No spam. Just your report. Unsubscribe anytime.

Key Considerations: W-2 vs 1099

Misclassification Risk is Real

The IRS penalizes employers who incorrectly classify employees as contractors. A growth operator needs to understand behavioral control, financial control, and relationship type before deciding to go 1099.

W-2 Costs More Than Salary

Budget 30-40% above the base salary for a W-2 employee when accounting for payroll taxes, benefits, workers comp, and processing. Most growth leaders underestimate true employment costs.

Controller-Led Compliance Saves Penalties

A dedicated controller ensures proper classification, accurate tax filings, and timely payments. Misclassification penalties cost far more than controller-led oversight would have saved.

10-15 day

Month-end close

12 hrs

Exec time saved/month

4.4

TrustPilot rating

5.0

Clutch rating

Compliance Matters More Than Cost Savings

A controller-signed payroll audit ensures your employment classifications are defensible. That documentation is worth more than the difference between W-2 and 1099 costs when an audit happens.